|
CORRUPTION has
been eating into the vitals of our society since its very
inception. In the past, it has been rising gradually but
recently, it has assumed alarming proportions. Now, it is a
heated topic of debate at all levels.
Efforts have been made in the past to eradicate it from our
midst but no worthwhile breakthrough was visibly achieved.
Causes of its dismal failure can be attributed to lack of
sincerity on the part of our law-enforcing agencies. Half
hearted and semi-baked efforts of the rulers have also been
responsible for its failure.
Today, there is a general perception that those at the helm of
affairs in Pakistan have started collecting around them the
ill-reputed corrupt people. They are patronized so long as
they serve the key interests of the Government in power. The
corrupt elements know the weakness of their rulers and as such
dabble in activities which eventually set the trend for
entering into corrupt practices.
The present Government glibly talks of prescribing a
merit-based system to check corruption”. But unfortunately,
merit does not count much under the existing corrupt political
system. In our case, it is the political opportunism which
reigns supreme. Regrettably, one haven of many fantastic
stories with regard to the formulation and consolidation of
PML-Q. It is now being openly talked about that “careful and
deliberate preparations” stretched over three years had given
into the formation of this “blue-eyed” party.
It may, however, be mentioned here that corruption is not the
sole prerogative of Pakistan. In underdeveloped countries,
this is a wide spread malaise, so much so, that even the only
superpower of the world, with all its loud claims of its
respect for law and its complete adherence to democratic
values, has shown blatant disregard for propriety, as cases of
massive corruption were noticed during the Presidential
elections of George W Bush. Contracts worth billions of
dollars were doled out to “most deserving cases” even, without
audit from liods. These acts of “generosity” have also been
repeated in Iraq now.
There are various factors that primarily facilitate the
corruption process, but the prime responsibility of promoting
this business, revolves round failure of good governance. We
feel that things can improve only when, merit is scrupulously
observed, at the time of retirement, promotion and posting in
the bureaucracy. Considerations other than merit seriously
militate against this concept.
It is unfortunate that inefficient people, manage to attain
high positions in life by dabbling in corrupt practices. Such
people believe in making hay while the sun shines.
It will be pertinent to point out here that the good
governance can be ensured by installing an independent
judiciary, a conscious citizenry and above all a free Press.
Viewed in this context, credit goes to the present government
for guaranteeing substantial freedom of Press. It is due to
this freedom, that some of the crimes of the bureaucratic
set-up have come to light.
However, in the absence of an independent judiciary and a
conscious citizenry, all claims of eradicating corruption have
come to naught. It is sad to observe that the Government,
hardly takes notice of the Press reports and brushes aside
people’s grievances.
There is a general perception among people that low salaries
generally lead to corruption. This may be partially true, but
hard fact of life is that this facile argument is advanced by
those who wish to do nothing or want to justify their failure
to deliver goods.
It is almost an axiomatic truth that corruption generally
increases in authoritarian system. Under dictatorship,
corruption generally tends to grow, as people lose their
control over their Government. In the pat, we may say that
corruption was well under control and was limited only to
lower-level. But with passage of time, things have drastically
changed. Today, “king”, wearing gaudy “clothes” is seen
“naked” everywhere and corruption has become a way of life.
Corruption in the higher circles is more endemic, more intense
and more pervasive.
With reference to the much-trumpeted process of
accountability, we regret to say that this process primarily
focuses on “sorting out” the political adversaries of the
uncorrected bureaucrats. This partial process of
accountability leads to cynicism and with it, the level of
corruption is invariably raised.
President Musharraf is correct in saying that corruption at
the highest level is unpardonable and as such the ‘big fish’
must be severely punished. However, he did not spell out as to
who would bell the cat. Military rulers generally do not help
create a democratic order. On the other hand, institutions are
based on strong and eternal values. And unless the rulers
uphold and practice such values, good governance is destined
to remain a distant dream.
To reiterate, an honest, dedicated and sincere leadership is
the only touchstone of eradicating corruption. For this,
democratic dispensation is its pre-requisite”. Democracy tries
to create ideal conditions in society and tries to steer the
nation to progress. In case, people are vigilant and uphold
the principles of democracy, it should not be difficult to
achieve the desired goals.
The writer is a freelance columnist and analyst.
|