|
|
 |
 |
Impact of Indo-Israel nexus on
Iran
By
Shahid Saleem Afzal
NEW
Delhi accorded formal recognition to Israel in 1950. In view of Israel’s
human rights abuses in Palestine and high stakes of India in Middle Eastern
countries, India kept the relationship at a low key.
Normalisation came more than four decades after India recognised Israel. The
post-9/11 scenario changed things and gave India an opportunity to exploit
the situation to gain maximum from the West by taking a U-turn in its
foreign policy. With the US granting India the status of a strategic
partner, India was encouraged to snuggle closer to the US at the cost of
Russia. The US and Israel have always enjoyed exceptional relationship.
Hence, India has become a natural ally and strategic partner of both the
countries. Its relationship with Iran remains unchanged, but it will be
difficult for India to maintain the same tempo because of the open hostility
of its new friends towards Iran.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s visit to India in 2003 gave birth to a
new era of special relations between the two countries. The United States
and Israel are not at all happy with India’s close ties with the Islamic
regime in Iran. But if India has continued to pursue its policy of
encirclement of Pakistan, it needs to maintain close ties with Iran,
Afghanistan and other Central Asian countries bordering Pakistan. The US and
Israel have signalled many times to India to keep at a distance from Iran.
But India continues to maintain close relations with Iran for economic
reasons and to undermine Pakistan.
The Indo-Israeli relations are based on a rock solid foundation, posing a
direct threat to Iran. Both countries are getting closer to each other with
every passing day. The Israeli Vice Premier visited India in December 2004
along with an accompanying delegation of 100 businessmen. During the visit
several agreements were concluded to boost cooperation between the two
countries. Indian trade with Israel is growing exponentially with a target
of US$5 billion in three years. In 2004, Indo-Israeli trade would cross US
$2 billion.
On December 2, 2004, Indo-Israel Joint Working Group in New Delhi discussed
measures to curb terror financing and denying terrorists the capability to
use anti-aircraft missiles. The two sides were of the view that recent
resolutions of the UN Security Council, particularly 1373, 1540 and 1566,
provided a valuable framework for strengthening cooperation against
terrorism at the international level. The two countries have repeatedly
stressed on the growing need for counter-terrorism cooperation within the
international community, specifically to strengthen political will and
capacity building. While there is active cooperation between the two
countries in the field, little of it is publicised for security reasons and
sensitivity of the issue with relation to Iran.
Another agreement that was concluded during the visit of the Israeli Vice
Premier relates to establishment of a bilateral R&D fund and R&D
cooperation. Each partner will invest $1 million annually in the fund. The
fund will be called the India-Israel R&D Cooperation Initiative (IIRDCI).
Israel signed a letter of intent to promote research and development in
areas such as advanced materials and nanotechnology to produce products
targeting world market. Currently, there are 37 projects in Science and
Technology between the two sides and there have also been many scientific
visits.
The Israeli delegation to ‘India had representatives from 50 companies.
During the four-day visit to Mumbai, Delhi and Banglore, Olmert met with
ministers of Industry and Trade from several states, and with the Indian
Minister of Agriculture, discussing cooperation between companies from the
two countries, both in India and in Third Wrold countries. Olmert discussed
the inclusion of Israeli companies in government tenders in India.
Discussions were also held towards the signing of a future customs
exemption/reduction agreement, in order to substantially boost Israeli
civilian exports to India and improve cooperation between customs
authorities in the two countries. A financial protocol was also discussed,
as well as the inclusion of Israeli companies in the upgrading of
agriculture in India. Meetings were also held with the Indian Minister of
Communications and Information Technology for implementation of the R&D
agreement for information technology, which the two countries signed in
2002. The penetration of communications technology, especially cellular
technology, also came under discussion. The Indian Government plans to hook
up every village to at least one satellite communications line (in order to
avoid the high cost of installing land lines). The Government Communications
Company will implement the project, but the potential for including Israeli
companies is great. Talking to journalists, Ehud Olmert said he expected no
difficulties in dealing with India’s Congress Party. “It was the Congress
Government which established friendly relations with us and I find no
difference in policy of the previous Government and the present regime,” Mr
Olmert said.
During the visit India agreed not to pass Israeli defence technology on to
Iran. Israel was assured of this at the highest level. This was in response
to Sharon’s demand from India what he called “reciprocity”. In return for
the Phalcon radar system and sensitive intelligence reports on terrorism,
for instance, Israel asked India to disavow anti-Israel resolutions in the
UN and other multilateral bodies. More significant, it also asked India to
be mindful of Israel’s security concerns before developing even closer ties
with Iran. Israel is seriously concerned about India-Iran ties.
The Hindutva philosophy has taken roots in India. The Hindutva philosophy of
“cultural nationalism” looks at the world Muslim community as one nation.
Hindutva’s cultural nationalism predates Samuel Huntington’s “clash of
civilizations” theory by almost a century. The idea of a Muslim monolith is
so deeply ingrained that even if they try to do so, Hindutva ideologues
confess that they are unable to distinguish between Muslims of different
countries. In time to come they would expect India to go along with Israel
and the United States in destroying Iran, the second destination, after
Iraq, in President George W Bush’s war against his “axis of evil”. A
‘nuclear Iran suspected of supporting Palestinians and organisations
sympathetic to them, faces a great threat of attack on its nuclear
installations, which may be sooner rather than later. India would support
such an operation clandestinely, while opposing it in the eyes of the world,
not to annoy Iran because of economic reasons.
After all, following destruction comes reconstruction in which India would
not like to lose. “We hope that India will try to civilize the Iranians, “
the Israeli Vice Premier said during the visit. Israel is keen that India
display greater awareness on how a possible possession of WMD by Iran could
destabilise West Asia. The two sides freely exchanged views on the
developing threat of WMD possibly falling into hands of terrorist
organisations.●
© 2005 Shahid Saleem Afzal
|
 |
 |
ADVERTISEMENTS
 |
|
|
Place Your Ads Here, Email:
Marketing@PakistanTimes.net |